'Tiger
Unsung'
Last month, the Marxist West Bengal government organised
a three-day event to commemorate the 201st death anniversary
of Tipu Sultan. Yet, in the territory that he ruled, the
Tiger of Mysore, ironically, was left unhonoured and unsung.
Just last year, the Janata Dal government had made grand
announcements that it would
commemorate the bicentenary year in a befitting manner.
Yet, precious little was done, even as the period limped
to a close in the early part of last month. It had drawn
up plans to bring out a booklet on the life and secular
policies of Tipu, besides producing a documentary and developing
a website to depict his legacy! An international centre
for research, a documentary film and a bravery award in
his name for the State police were promised. None of these
grandiose proposals fructified. In fact, the Bicentenary
Year Observance Committee, headed by Roshan Baig, then in
the J H Patel ministry, did not meet even once. The State
government was satisfied with a seminar attended by
historians from Norway and Scotland at the City, in May
last year.
Roshan Baig, now the Tourism Minster, defended that due
to the change in government, and later the Panchayat and
Zilla Parishad elections, there was no time to follow up
on the celebration plans. But now, with the appointment
of a new Director for the Kannada and Culture Department,
something will be chalked out soon.
Tipu died defending his capital, Srirangapatna, against
the British onslaught in the IVth Mysore War of 1799. Tipus
skirmishes with the British constituted the rearguard action
of the native princes against British domination and with
his fall, the British suzerainty over the subcontinent was
complete.
Prof S Chandrashekhar, from the History Department, Bangalore
University, points out that Tipu fought for independence,
which distinguishes him from other weak and compliant kings
of his time.
We should have had at least a symbolic celebration in his
memory.
Noted historian, Sheikh Ali, confirms that the West Bengal
government had organised a three-day commemorative event
from May 2, though the Sultans only link with Calcutta is
that his descendants are living there, albeit in penury.
The commemoration, from May 2, was attended by three former
prime ministers -- H D Deve Gowda, V P Singh and Chandrashekhar.
A number of seminars and debates for students and a unique
exhibition on his life sang his glory.
Prof Ali, who attended them in Calcutta, regrets that the
Karnataka government did not think it fit to carry out its
original plans. The Karnataka governments move has been
mired in controversy, what with the Vishwa Hindu Parishad
and the Bajrang Dal threatening to disrupt the commemoration,
claiming that Tipu was a religious bigot.
The State Minorities Commission Chairman, Azeez Sait, who
is also a Congress MLA, was of the view that the threats
could not have scuttled the event if the government had
shown interest. After all, what could they have done?he
asks.
The governments failure to observe the bicentenary after
making an announcement, amounts to disrespecting the great
warrior king. He squarely blames Mr Baig, who contines to
be a minister. Bharatiya Janata Party MLC, Mr Madhusudhan,
says the event fizzled out because there is no enthusiasm
among the people. Tipu was a communal ruler who forced conversions
in Kerala and Kodagu. He was not a freedom fighter because
he only fought the British to safeguard his own kingdom,
he shrugs.
Hotly disputing his views, former State minister, Mohammed
Moienuddin, who has done ten years of research on Tipu,
points out that Sringeri Mutt still has fabulous jewels
donated by Tipu and his father Hyder Ali, while his letters,
which spoke of his generous donations, showed that he held
Goddess Sharada Devi in reverence. Tipu helped the mutt
when the Marathas plundered it.
Tipu was a social reformer as well, having abolished prostitution
and introduced prohibition. Charges of conversions are exaggerated,
he says, even if it is true that Tipu offered his prisoners
of war the choice of imprisonment or conversion and many
opted to become Muslims. Others became Muslims to curry
his favour.
Prof Chandrashekhar adds that Tipus conversionsshould not
be seen as a religious move, but in the context of the political
set-up he was mired in. It was more to isolate some people
in Malabar psychologically.
|